The specific carbohydrate diet (SCD) and GAPS diet: what they really restrict, and what the evidence shows

Overhead flat lay of foods representing The Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD) and GAPS Diet arranged beautifully on a wooden surface

If you've spent any time in forums for IBD, IBS, or other stubborn digestive issues, you've probably run into two acronyms that keep popping up: SCD and GAPS. They sound clinical and a little mysterious, but the eating pattern behind them is fairly simple to describe, even if it's not simple to live with day to day. Below is a plain look at what they really involve, why people turn to them, and what's backed by evidence versus what's mostly hope and anecdote.

What these diets cut out

The Specific Carbohydrate Diet, usually just called SCD, was built around one core idea: certain carbohydrates are hard for a struggling gut to break down and absorb, and when they sit around undigested they feed bacteria and yeast that make things worse. So SCD eliminates most grains, most starchy vegetables like potatoes, refined sugar, and most processed foods, and leans on meat, fish, eggs, most fruits, many vegetables, nuts, and certain aged cheeses and homemade yogurt fermented for a long time.

The GAPS diet, which stands for Gut and Psychology Syndrome, grew directly out of SCD and shares almost the same restricted list. GAPS adds an emphasis on bone broth, fermented foods, and a staged introduction process that starts extremely simple, think broths and cooked meat, and slowly adds foods back in over weeks or months. Practically speaking, if someone tells you they're doing SCD or GAPS, expect a plate with meat, vegetables, and maybe a little fruit, and not much else.

SCD

Eliminates most grains, starchy vegetables, refined sugar, and processed foods. Meat, fish, eggs, fruit, vegetables, nuts, aged cheese.

GAPS

Same restricted list as SCD, plus bone broth and fermented foods, with a staged reintroduction over weeks to months.

Why gut healing was the whole point

Both diets were designed decades ago with a specific theory in mind: undigested carbohydrates ferment in the gut, feed an overgrowth of unhelpful microbes, and damage the intestinal lining, and removing those carbs gives the gut a chance to calm down and repair. That theory is why you'll see these diets discussed so often in the context of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and other inflammatory bowel conditions, not as general wellness plans. The goal was never weight loss or energy or clear skin. It was specifically about calming a gut that wasn't functioning well. If you're living with one of these conditions day to day, what daily life with Crohn's disease looks like and living through the ups and downs of ulcerative colitis cover that ground beyond diet alone.

What the research shows

The picture here is nuanced. Interest in SCD for IBD is real and growing, and a handful of small studies and case series have found that some people with Crohn's disease report symptom improvement and even changes in inflammatory markers while following it. Researchers have also looked at GAPS style approaches with similarly small scale, promising but limited results. What you won't find is large randomized controlled trials proving these diets outperform standard medical treatment, or that they work for everyone with a given condition. The honest summary is that this is a real area of active research, distinct from vague elimination diets, but it hasn't graduated to strong, definitive evidence yet.

Correlation and cause deserve to be separated here too. When someone feels better after weeks of eating this way, some of that could come from cutting processed food and sugar generally, some could come from the specific carbohydrate mechanism the diet is built on, and some could just be the natural ebb and flow that inflammatory conditions have on their own. Good research tries to untangle that, and for SCD and GAPS specifically, that untangling is still in progress. Tracking symptoms alongside a marker like fecal calprotectin, the at-home test that tells you if it's IBS or something else, can help separate a real response to the diet from normal day-to-day fluctuation.

Why you shouldn't just try this on your own

Use under medical guidanceSCD and GAPS are highly restrictive, more so than almost any other eating pattern people commonly attempt. Cutting out all grains, most starches, and sugar simultaneously is a real nutritional shift, and doing it while managing an inflammatory bowel condition raises the stakes even further. These diets were designed to be used under guidance, ideally alongside a doctor or registered dietitian who can watch for nutrient gaps, unintended weight loss, and how your specific condition responds.

Going in alone, without medical oversight, means missing the safety net that makes this approach reasonable in the first place. If IBD has been part of your history for years, long-standing IBD and colorectal cancer risk is another topic to raise with your care team alongside any dietary changes.

Where that leaves you

If you're dealing with a digestive condition that hasn't responded well to standard approaches, SCD or GAPS might be worth a real conversation with your doctor or a dietitian who has experience with them.

1Bring the question to your next appointment
2Ask whether your specific diagnosis is one where the current evidence is relevant
3Ask what a supervised trial period could look like, including how nutrient gaps would be monitored

It's a concrete, doable step, and it puts you in the driver's seat with expert backup on your side as you approach one of the more demanding diets out there. If a related restrictive pattern like the autoimmune protocol diet has also come up in your research, the same medical-guidance principle applies there too.

What to do with this

Don't start SCD or GAPS without a doctor or dietitian involved, bring a specific question about your diagnosis and the current evidence to your next appointment, and ask what monitoring a supervised trial period would include before you begin.

This content is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice.

Related reading

Share this article